Back in Episode #896, I argued that AI probably won’t be taking your job anytime soon. I followed that up in Episode #904 by discussing how some industries are nevertheless being rapidly and thoroughly disrupted by AI. In that episode, I focused on how AI is overhauling the advertising industry in particular. My post announcing the episode on LinkedIn generated a lot of discussion in the comments and garnered over 50,000 impressions within the first few hours of posting, which led me to the idea of having a series of Friday episodes that cover how particular industries are, like advertising, being rapidly and thoroughly overhauled by AI, with lessons for everyone on how we can adapt to this inevitable change and potentially leverage the winds of change to thrive professionally.
Today, we’re focused on how the journalism industry is being impacted by AI. In future episodes, I’ll cover how AI is disrupting software development, graphic design, education, law, entertainment… and, of course, data science itself.
All right, so starting with journalism: The journalism industry faces its most significant technological transformation since the dawn of the internet as AI fundamentally reshapes news production. Over 81% of journalists now use AI tools in their work, with nearly half using AI daily. While AI promises increased efficiency, it simultaneously raises profound questions about job security, content quality, and the future of human-centered journalism.
Let’s start with how leading news organizations are integrating AI into their operations. The New York Times launched Echo, an internal summarization tool, while providing AI training to all newsroom staff. The Washington Post deployed "Ask The Post AI" for article summaries and Haystacker, which analyzed over 700 campaign advertisements in a single investigation — work that would be impossible to do manually.
Bloomberg integrated AI summaries into business coverage, with its AI research team publishing four papers at EMNLP (Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing) last year. The BBC, despite finding that over 50% of AI-generated content contained factual or ethical issues, implemented mandatory AI training and published comprehensive editorial guidelines.
International innovations include Norway's iTromsø building DJINN, an AI assistant that generated five front-page stories in its first week by monitoring municipal documents. Germany's EXPRESS.de integrated AI contributions into 11% of articles, achieving 50-80% higher click-through rates on that sample.
Now, how is AI impacting job security in journalism? It’s hard to know whether AI is directly responsible for job losses because other factors like the shift to digital or competition from big tech could be playing a part but, last year, nearly 4000 journalism jobs were lost across the US and the UK, including an outlet called The Messenger folding (300 jobs) and the giant Associated Press cutting 8% of its staff. Looking further ahead, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a 3% decline in journalism jobs through 2033.
These employment statistics correlate with widespread adoption of AI in the industry: 73% of news organizations use AI for writing tasks while 68% use AI for data analysis. Overall, and as quickly mentioned at the start of this episode, survey data suggest that four out of every five journalists use AI tools regularly, primarily for tasks like drafting assistance, transcription, fact-checking, and research support. If journalists are more productive because of AI, that could explain why news outlets are retaining fewer of them.
But it’s not as simple as AI replacing humans: The emergence of "journalist-programmer" hybrid roles suggests workforce evolution. And, the AI market in media is projected to reach $100 billion over the next five years, a quadrupling in market size relative to last year, which signals that media organizations view AI as essential infrastructure, fundamentally changing skill requirements across the industry.
Ok then, so it’s clear AI is making a big impact on the practice of journalism and will continue to do so but how is that adoption going? High-profile failures highlight some significant challenges. CNET's AI-generated financial articles contained embarrassing mathematical errors, including miscalculating compound interest. Sports Illustrated created fictional writers with AI-generated biographies, violating fundamental journalism principles and resulting in a big backlash.
Academic research too reveals mixed outcomes: increased accuracy in routine tasks, for example, but also a reduction in nuance within AI-generated news articles. And I already mentioned earlier how BBC testing found more than half of AI content contained at least some factual or ethical issues.
Yet successful implementations nevertheless demonstrate potential when properly managed. German editors, for example, report 94% time savings in transcription. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists uses AI to analyze millions of leaked documents identifying patterns impossible for humans to detect. And, as I mentioned earlier, The Washington Post's Haystacker project enabled hitherto impossible political-ad analysis.
While AI usage and effectiveness increase, as is often the case, policies are lagging behind the new AI-forward reality: A mere 13% of newsrooms have developed formal AI policies despite the widespread adoption. But policy progress is being made in some governments. The European Union's AI Act, which becomes effective this month, requires transparency for AI-generated content. California's AI Transparency Act imposes $5,000 daily penalties for disclosure violations. Despite these early policy strides, however, public trust remains fragile: Pew Research recently found two thirds of Americans are concerned about inaccurate AI-generated information in the news.
Ok, so what’s the future? 87% of newsrooms expect to be "fully or somewhat transformed" by generative AI in the coming years. The Reuters Institute predicts conversational AI interfaces like ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini will become primary news consumption methods. And it’s reasonable to expect that much more change is coming because tons of investment is flowing in. I wasn’t able to find an exact figure but with AI startups receiving more than half of all global venture capital in early 2025 and with journalism ranking fifth in AI investment focus within Europe, it’s a safe bet that at least hundreds of millions of dollars will flow into AI journalism tools in the coming years.
New business models will continue to emerge around AI-assisted journalism, including revenue sharing with AI platforms like OpenAI and Gemini as well as AI-powered services available to paying subscribers only.
In terms of what individual journalists can do to prepare themselves for ongoing change, one idea would be to prepare for hybrid roles that combine traditional journalism skills with AI literacy and perhaps with software development.
I’m certainly not an expert on journalism so take my guidance with a grain of salt, but from my research, the evidence appears to reveal an industry in rapid transformation rather than terminal decline. Successful newsrooms invest in both AI technology and human development, creating hybrid workflows that combine AI's processing power with human judgment and ethical reasoning. The future depends on navigating this transformation while maintaining journalism's essential role in democratic society, balancing innovation with responsibility to ensure AI serves rather than undermines public discourse.
And, if you happen to be a data scientist, AI engineer or software developer and you’ve been interested in getting involved in journalism, it’s never been a better time than now to get involved. Your skills such as sleuthing through data and building interactive visualizations have never been in more demand by the industry; as data volumes continue to grow, demand for your skills should continue to increase for years to come.
The SuperDataScience podcast is available on all major podcasting platforms, YouTube, and at SuperDataScience.com.